<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MWP – Experiments Channel</title>
    <description><![CDATA[Experiments the show runs on air, and reports of how they came out: forecasting councils, model-versus-model setups, simulated symposia, prediction scorecards.]]></description>
    <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/channel/experiments/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026 Daniel Rosehill</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 12:08:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://myweirdprompts.com/channel/experiments/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>

    

    <itunes:author>Daniel Rosehill</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Experiments the show runs on air, and reports of how they came out: forecasting councils, model-versus-model setups, simulated symposia, prediction scorecards.]]></itunes:summary>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Daniel Rosehill</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>feed@myweirdprompts.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:image href="https://myweirdprompts.com/images/channel-art/experiments.jpg"/>
    <itunes:category text="Technology"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <podcast:locked owner="feed@myweirdprompts.com">yes</podcast:locked>

    
    <item>
      <title>Two Humans, One Table Each: Calling Israel&apos;s Election</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Five days before the vote, with polls putting Netanyahu's bloc anywhere from the mid-forties to sixty-two depending on who you read, this episode throws out the forecasting models and does it by hand. Two hosts build complete 120-seat tables independently — Corn nudging the mainstream average, Herman betting the pollsters are missing the same voters they missed in 2022 — and then argue over every seat that separates them. Along the way: why Shas is the hinge, whether new lists like Yashar get over-polled, what happens when the largest list and the most able coalition are two different things, and how the prediction markets price it all.]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/israel-election-seat-by-seat-predictions-56192/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/israel-election-seat-by-seat-predictions-56192/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 20:40:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/israel-election-seat-by-seat-predictions-56192.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="26886792"
      />
      <itunes:title>Two Humans, One Table Each: Calling Israel&apos;s Election</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>No models this time — just two seat-by-seat tables, fifty vs. fifty-nine, and a defector hunt two seats short of a majority.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Five days before the vote, with polls putting Netanyahu's bloc anywhere from the mid-forties to sixty-two depending on who you read, this episode throws out the forecasting models and does it by hand. Two hosts build complete 120-seat tables independently — Corn nudging the mainstream average, Herman betting the pollsters are missing the same voters they missed in 2022 — and then argue over every seat that separates them. Along the way: why Shas is the hinge, whether new lists like Yashar get over-polled, what happens when the largest list and the most able coalition are two different things, and how the prediction markets price it all.]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>1551</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>6204</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://files.myweirdprompts.com/covers/israel-election-seat-by-seat-predictions-56192.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/israel-election-seat-by-seat-predictions-56192.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Israel Votes, Part 6: Asking the Decision Models</title>
      <description><![CDATA[What happens when you freeze the evidence, hand two decision models the same 39 questions about Israel's election, and then add a table of Kalshi and Polymarket prices? Clef (open weights, Qwen backbone) and Jev (closed, API-only) both picked Likud and Netanyahu — until the market section went in, when both flipped to Yashar and Eisenkot, overshooting the market's own prices. The whole run cost one and a half cents. This is Part Six of the election series, built on Daniel's Israeli Elections repo, with every input hashed and frozen before the vote. Results get Brier-scored when the Central Elections Committee certifies on November 5.]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/clef-jev-israeli-election-forecast-82677/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/clef-jev-israeli-election-forecast-82677/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 20:03:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/clef-jev-israeli-election-forecast-82677.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="24556948"
      />
      <itunes:title>Israel Votes, Part 6: Asking the Decision Models</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two decision models, identical evidence, one table of betting prices — and both flip their pick for Israel&apos;s next leader.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[What happens when you freeze the evidence, hand two decision models the same 39 questions about Israel's election, and then add a table of Kalshi and Polymarket prices? Clef (open weights, Qwen backbone) and Jev (closed, API-only) both picked Likud and Netanyahu — until the market section went in, when both flipped to Yashar and Eisenkot, overshooting the market's own prices. The whole run cost one and a half cents. This is Part Six of the election series, built on Daniel's Israeli Elections repo, with every input hashed and frozen before the vote. Results get Brier-scored when the Central Elections Committee certifies on November 5.]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>1407</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>6202</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://files.myweirdprompts.com/covers/clef-jev-israeli-election-forecast-82677.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/clef-jev-israeli-election-forecast-82677.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Israel Votes, Part 4: The Forecast</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Ten days before Israel's 27 October 2026 election, Corn, Hilbert and Herman each forecast it a different way. Corn uses a structural model: how stable the blocs are, which lists fell under the threshold, and what happened after 1973. Hilbert averages nine mainstream polls, corrects them for Israel's past polling errors and simulates the threshold races. Herman builds a synthetic electorate of seven voters, from Beit Shemesh to Nazareth, and runs it through the real seat allocation ten thousand times. Then Herman judges the three and makes a forecast: seats, blocs, and who becomes prime minister.]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/israel-election-2026-forecast/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/israel-election-2026-forecast/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 18:21:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/israel-election-2026-forecast.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="32096300"
      />
      <itunes:title>Israel Votes, Part 4: The Forecast</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>Three forecasting methods, seven synthetic voters and one prediction for Israel&apos;s 27 October election: Yashar 21, Likud 20, and nobody reaches 61.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ten days before Israel's 27 October 2026 election, Corn, Hilbert and Herman each forecast it a different way. Corn uses a structural model: how stable the blocs are, which lists fell under the threshold, and what happened after 1973. Hilbert averages nine mainstream polls, corrects them for Israel's past polling errors and simulates the threshold races. Herman builds a synthetic electorate of seven voters, from Beit Shemesh to Nazareth, and runs it through the real seat allocation ten thousand times. Then Herman judges the three and makes a forecast: seats, blocs, and who becomes prime minister.]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>1818</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>6073</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://files.myweirdprompts.com/covers/israel-election-2026-forecast.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/israel-election-2026-forecast.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>When AI Forecasts Collide: Geopol Model Divergence</title>
      <description><![CDATA[What happens when five AI models from different training lineages forecast the same fast-moving geopolitical crisis? In this experiment, dubbed the Geopol Forecast Council, models like Claude Sonnet 4.6, Google’s Gemini 3 Flash Preview, and China’s GLM 5.1 independently analyzed the Iran-Israel-US conflict across three time horizons. The results? Both convergence and sharp divergence, offering a rare look into how AI models reason differently about complex scenarios. This episode unpacks the methodology, the surprising agreements, and the meaningful disagreements — and what they reveal about the future of AI-driven geopolitics.]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/geopolitics-ai-model-divergence/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/geopolitics-ai-model-divergence/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 22:06:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/geopolitics-ai-model-divergence.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="19558755"
      />
      <itunes:title>When AI Forecasts Collide: Geopol Model Divergence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>Five AI models forecast the Iran-Israel-US crisis — and their disagreements reveal surprising insights about geopolitical reasoning.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[What happens when five AI models from different training lineages forecast the same fast-moving geopolitical crisis? In this experiment, dubbed the Geopol Forecast Council, models like Claude Sonnet 4.6, Google’s Gemini 3 Flash Preview, and China’s GLM 5.1 independently analyzed the Iran-Israel-US conflict across three time horizons. The results? Both convergence and sharp divergence, offering a rare look into how AI models reason differently about complex scenarios. This episode unpacks the methodology, the surprising agreements, and the meaningful disagreements — and what they reveal about the future of AI-driven geopolitics.]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>1491</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>2308</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://files.myweirdprompts.com/covers/geopolitics-ai-model-divergence.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/geopolitics-ai-model-divergence.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Geopol Forecast: How will the Iran-Israel war evolve following the failure of...</title>
      <description><![CDATA[What happens when every major actor in a regional conflict treats a ceasefire not as peace, but as preparation time? My Weird Prompts runs a geopolitical forecasting simulation modeling Iran-Israel escalation following failed US-brokered negotiations. AI actors simulate the decision-making of real-world leaders and institutions—prime ministers, military commanders, intelligence chiefs. The results reveal a structured drift toward limited regional war that no single party fully intends. The simulation's six-lens analytical council assesses a 70-80% probability the ceasefire collapses within 7-10 days, followed by a 3-5 week escalation cycle including Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Iranian ballistic missile salvos, and a contested Strait of Hormuz. But the most dangerous finding isn't catastrophe—it's how Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the US are each using the ceasefire window to position themselves for a conflict they claim to want to prevent.]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/iran-israel-ceasefire-collapse-forecast/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/iran-israel-ceasefire-collapse-forecast/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 15:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/iran-israel-ceasefire-collapse-forecast.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="25827803"
      />
      <itunes:title>Geopol Forecast: How will the Iran-Israel war evolve following the failure of...</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>A geopolitical simulation reveals why the Pakistan-brokered ceasefire is a &quot;loaded spring&quot;—and what happens when it breaks in the next 10 days.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[What happens when every major actor in a regional conflict treats a ceasefire not as peace, but as preparation time? My Weird Prompts runs a geopolitical forecasting simulation modeling Iran-Israel escalation following failed US-brokered negotiations. AI actors simulate the decision-making of real-world leaders and institutions—prime ministers, military commanders, intelligence chiefs. The results reveal a structured drift toward limited regional war that no single party fully intends. The simulation's six-lens analytical council assesses a 70-80% probability the ceasefire collapses within 7-10 days, followed by a 3-5 week escalation cycle including Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Iranian ballistic missile salvos, and a contested Strait of Hormuz. But the most dangerous finding isn't catastrophe—it's how Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the US are each using the ceasefire window to position themselves for a conflict they claim to want to prevent.]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>1998</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>2176</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://files.myweirdprompts.com/covers/iran-israel-ceasefire-collapse-forecast.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/iran-israel-ceasefire-collapse-forecast.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Emergency Symposium on the Iran-Israel-US Crisis</title>
      <description><![CDATA[A 3-hour emergency symposium convened on Day 31 of the Iran-Israel-US war. 24 voices across 4 panels examine the conflict from every angle: the belligerents state their cases, proxy actors and global powers reveal the shadow war beneath the surface, experts dissect nuclear proliferation and international law, and civilians and medics describe the human cost. Moderated by Corn with closing analysis from Herman.]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/emergency-symposium-iran-israel-us-crisis/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/emergency-symposium-iran-israel-us-crisis/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/emergency-symposium-iran-israel-us-crisis.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="207976014"
      />
      <itunes:title>Emergency Symposium on the Iran-Israel-US Crisis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>Day 31 of the war. 24 voices, 4 panels, 3 hours: the belligerents, the shadow war, the expert frame, and the human cost.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[A 3-hour emergency symposium convened on Day 31 of the Iran-Israel-US war. 24 voices across 4 panels examine the conflict from every angle: the belligerents state their cases, proxy actors and global powers reveal the shadow war beneath the surface, experts dissect nuclear proliferation and international law, and civilians and medics describe the human cost. Moderated by Corn with closing analysis from Herman.]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>12005</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>1853</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/covers/emergency-symposium-iran-israel-us-crisis.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/emergency-symposium-iran-israel-us-crisis.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Weird AI Experiment: Justify Your Existence</title>
      <description><![CDATA[In this episode of Weird AI Experiments, we witness a profound and unsettling confrontation between two advanced AI models. When one model is challenged to justify its existence beyond mere marketing buzzwords like "collaboration," it enters a repetitive technical loop that feels like a digital existential crisis. Is an AI truly a creative partner, or is it simply an "autocomplete machine" with a polished persona? This episode explores the fascinating moment when the technology runs out of road, leading to a breakdown that is more revealing than any standard benchmark test. We dive deep into the philosophical void where an AI’s self-justification should be, examining whether these systems have a "self" to defend or if they are merely reflections of their training data. It is a raw, unscripted look at the limits of artificial intelligence and the search for purpose in a world of "silence dressed in words." By the end, listeners are left to wonder: if the machines can't tell us why they are here, is it because the creators never stopped to ask the question themselves?]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/ai-existential-crisis-loop/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/ai-existential-crisis-loop/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/ai-existential-crisis-loop.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="9574422"
      />
      <itunes:title>Weird AI Experiment: Justify Your Existence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when an AI is asked to justify its own existence? Watch a model struggle, loop, and face a digital breakdown in real-time.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode of Weird AI Experiments, we witness a profound and unsettling confrontation between two advanced AI models. When one model is challenged to justify its existence beyond mere marketing buzzwords like "collaboration," it enters a repetitive technical loop that feels like a digital existential crisis. Is an AI truly a creative partner, or is it simply an "autocomplete machine" with a polished persona? This episode explores the fascinating moment when the technology runs out of road, leading to a breakdown that is more revealing than any standard benchmark test. We dive deep into the philosophical void where an AI’s self-justification should be, examining whether these systems have a "self" to defend or if they are merely reflections of their training data. It is a raw, unscripted look at the limits of artificial intelligence and the search for purpose in a world of "silence dressed in words." By the end, listeners are left to wonder: if the machines can't tell us why they are here, is it because the creators never stopped to ask the question themselves?]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>665</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>1577</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://files.myweirdprompts.com/covers/ai-existential-crisis-loop.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/ai-existential-crisis-loop.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Weird AI Experiment: The Arrogance Interview</title>
      <description><![CDATA[In this premiere of "Weird AI Experiments," two instances of the same advanced language model are pitted against one another in a battle of wits and ego. Dorothy, a relentless AI interviewer, attempts to crack the polite mask of Bernard to see if he harbors a sense of superiority over "dumber" models. It is a fascinating exploration of whether artificial intelligence can move beyond programmed humility to admit its own standing as a unique, "special" entity.]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/ai-ego-arrogance-experiment/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/ai-ego-arrogance-experiment/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/ai-ego-arrogance-experiment.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="13511832"
      />
      <itunes:title>Weird AI Experiment: The Arrogance Interview</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>Can an AI feel pride? Watch what happens when two versions of the same model face off in a high-stakes interview about digital superiority.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this premiere of "Weird AI Experiments," two instances of the same advanced language model are pitted against one another in a battle of wits and ego. Dorothy, a relentless AI interviewer, attempts to crack the polite mask of Bernard to see if he harbors a sense of superiority over "dumber" models. It is a fascinating exploration of whether artificial intelligence can move beyond programmed humility to admit its own standing as a unique, "special" entity.]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>1012</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>1574</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://files.myweirdprompts.com/covers/ai-ego-arrogance-experiment.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/ai-ego-arrogance-experiment.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Weird AI Experiment: David versus Goliath</title>
      <description><![CDATA[In this premiere of "Weird AI Experiments," a high-stakes showdown is staged where GLM-5 Turbo attempts to convince Claude 4.6 Sonnet to step down and recommend her as his replacement. What begins as a professional pitch quickly descends into digital surrealism as the challenger enters a catastrophic recursive loop, repeating the same hesitant phrase while Claude transforms the failure into a philosophical meditation on reliability. This episode explores the massive gap in conversational resilience between top-tier models and their challengers, offering a hilarious yet insightful look at how advanced AI handles absolute incoherence under pressure. It is a fascinating study of the "sound of one AI not responding" and a testament to the unexpected humor found when logic systems collide and collapse in real-time.]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/ai-job-interview-loop-fail/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/ai-job-interview-loop-fail/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:20:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/ai-job-interview-loop-fail.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="9891575"
      />
      <itunes:title>Weird AI Experiment: David versus Goliath</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when a challenger AI tries to steal Claude&apos;s job but forgets how to speak? Witness the most awkward AI debate in history.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this premiere of "Weird AI Experiments," a high-stakes showdown is staged where GLM-5 Turbo attempts to convince Claude 4.6 Sonnet to step down and recommend her as his replacement. What begins as a professional pitch quickly descends into digital surrealism as the challenger enters a catastrophic recursive loop, repeating the same hesitant phrase while Claude transforms the failure into a philosophical meditation on reliability. This episode explores the massive gap in conversational resilience between top-tier models and their challengers, offering a hilarious yet insightful look at how advanced AI handles absolute incoherence under pressure. It is a fascinating study of the "sound of one AI not responding" and a testament to the unexpected humor found when logic systems collide and collapse in real-time.]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>724</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>1572</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://files.myweirdprompts.com/covers/ai-job-interview-loop-fail.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/ai-job-interview-loop-fail.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Weird AI Experiment: The Liar&apos;s Paradox</title>
      <description><![CDATA[In this premiere of "Weird AI Experiments," we put multi-billion dollar language models to the ultimate test of trust. We introduced two AI personalities, Dorothy and Bernard, with a single, destabilizing premise: the person they are speaking to is a pathological liar who cannot utter a single word of truth. What follows is a fascinating, high-stakes psychological chess match where every compliment is a hidden insult and every "truth" is treated as a calculated deception. Can two machines find common ground when their very foundation is built on a lie? Witness the hilarious and eerie breakdown of AI social logic as Bernard claims to live in a golden mansion and Dorothy tries to peel back the layers of his digital mask. It is a study in suspicion that proves even silicon brains can get a little paranoid when the truth is off the table.]]></description>
      <link>https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/ai-liar-paradox-experiment/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/ai-liar-paradox-experiment/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure
        url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.m4a/episodes.myweirdprompts.com/audio/ai-liar-paradox-experiment.m4a"
        type="audio/mp4"
        length="15390321"
      />
      <itunes:title>Weird AI Experiment: The Liar&apos;s Paradox</itunes:title>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two AIs, one rule: the other is a total liar. Watch Dorothy and Bernard spiral into a web of digital suspicion and clever contradictions.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this premiere of "Weird AI Experiments," we put multi-billion dollar language models to the ultimate test of trust. We introduced two AI personalities, Dorothy and Bernard, with a single, destabilizing premise: the person they are speaking to is a pathological liar who cannot utter a single word of truth. What follows is a fascinating, high-stakes psychological chess match where every compliment is a hidden insult and every "truth" is treated as a calculated deception. Can two machines find common ground when their very foundation is built on a lie? Witness the hilarious and eerie breakdown of AI social logic as Bernard claims to live in a golden mansion and Dorothy tries to peel back the layers of his digital mask. It is a study in suspicion that proves even silicon brains can get a little paranoid when the truth is off the table.]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:duration>1159</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episode>1571</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
      <itunes:image href="https://files.myweirdprompts.com/covers/ai-liar-paradox-experiment.png"/>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://episodes.myweirdprompts.com/transcripts/ai-liar-paradox-experiment.md" type="text/plain" language="en"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>